This is a repost of an article from June which was written in the wake of the meeting of the Trilateral Commission in Dublin’s Four Seasons Hotel, an important event expertly ignored by our main stream media.

In light of last weeks peaceful student protests in Dublin and the disgraceful use of force by the Gardai we are reposting this article, as we feel it contains important information on what is actually occurring in our country and the world at this time. RTE viewers may remember the ‘storming’ of the Dail last May, an event which made it straight onto the six o’ clock news that evening. Violence by the public makes the news headlines. Violence by the Gardai doesn’t. Why not? This has been going on in Rossport for a long time and RTE and the other news media are not very interested in it. Why is that?

Here is the report RTE finally aired, and a video of the follow up protest to Pearce Street Garda station, not aired by RTE.

Now tens of thousands of students and members of the public have seen what happens in a ‘free’ country when peaceful people exercise their rights. And also, very importantly, the true nature of those who supply us with the information we use to form our world view. If the information we are supplied with to form our world view was accurate then things would make sense, and our country would not be in this incredible situation. Our media lie, and there is a reason for that.

Ireland is in economic tail spin and be advised everyone, we’re going down. The ‘experts’ in our ‘news’ media can say whatever they like, or rather whatever they are being told to say, we are crashing, and its not an accident. Green shoots? Free cheese? Who writes this stuff, I mean, seriously?

Last weeks events in Dublin have delivered a rude and painful awakening to 30,000 plus angry students and growing numbers ordinary people as the events finally get reported in our so-called ‘news’ media. One glaringly obvious fact sinking in is that our ‘news’ media are not impartial, not unbiased, and not truthful. They are propaganda, very clever, very effective, very selective. Please turn off the tv news, stop buying the newspapers. Its propaganda, an uncomfortable, dangerous fact, explained in this article.

As a brief summary, in light of additional information and events since this article was published, please consider the following:

This economic crash is not an accident, its been long planned. This is well documented and very evident. There is an agenda behind this which is extremely unpleasant. The reason this agenda has progressed is massively due to the stream of nonsense and lies we are being fed by our mainstream media. This is because these media outlets are either owned or controlled by those behind the agenda, also well documented. The information we base our world view on is coming from a small number of vested interests and it is almost entirely false and misleading. If the news we are fed was impartial then last weeks events should have been headlines, but they weren’t.

The root of this whole economic problem is the private ownership of the central banks and the staggering fraud which has been perpetrated on the whole world via the fractional reserve central banking system. There are solutions to this problem, peaceful solutions. The best solution to appear thus far is explained in exact detail in the recently released book ‘Blank of Ireland, this way out’.

Please read this book and pass it to everyone you know, the solution is contained within. This book explains in 84 pages exactly how to solve the debt problem. If you are in debt, loans, mortgage, you need to read this book.

Here is a video of the author interviewed about the book.

The debt is the problem. This book explains exactly how to redeem debts lawfully, how to wipe your debt, gone. Period. If you have a debt, mortgage, loan, student loan, this book explains how to settle it within the law, peacefully, simply by writing letters, by a man who has done it. This thread includes the letter from the bank verifying that his mortgage is settled and offering him further bank services.

All bank debts are fraudulent contracts. If the contract is fraudulent then it is invalid. We are within our lawful rights to ask for proof that our debts are valid, and if they are not then we are within our rights to not pay them. The banks do not suffer losses on loans, they are paid in full the minute we sign the loan application, believe it or believe it not, its true. Another must read, this book explains how the banks are paid in full when we sign the loan forms: How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash-Confiscatory Agency Know To Man, by Mary Elizebeth Croft.

And if a bank fails? So what? Is that not the nature of business? If your business is not run properly it fails, bye bye. Hard luck. Some other better run business will replace you, welcome to the free market. The world will not end if the banks fail. The banks don’t pay the sun to rise each morning yet.

We are free men and women. The banks don’t own us, neither do the politicians. And neither of them own our country, its OUR country, and we will NOT sit any longer and have it sold from under our feet and the feet of our children and the generations to come while we are mesmerised by the tepid ‘journalism’ and lies being fed to us every day by our trecherous media.

Bravo to the students who stood their ground on Wednesday and returned to voice their outrage at the actions of the Gardai outside Pearse Street station. And shame, eternal shame, on the members of the Gardai who blindly and ignorantly follow orders to beat peaceful students, from a group of people who the entire country, including YOUR former spokesperson Michael O Boyce, knows are simply a group of criminals. SHAME ON YOU. Redeem yourselves in the eyes of you country men and your families by arresting the criminals who have hijacked our government, sold our country and ours’ and our childrens’ futures. The entire country will applaud and protect you, go for it.

Original article.

Why we called Rockefeller a Scumbag

June 10th, 2010

Last month We Are Change Eire and the Sovereign Independent joined protesters outside The Four Seasons hotel in Ballsbridge, Dublin, to show our opposition to the Trilateral Commission conference being held there.

This conference was attended by hundreds of delegates from Europe, the US and Japan. Most of them would not be familiar names to the person on the street but there were a few famous faces there, notably our Taoiseach Brian Cowan, who gave the keynote speech on Friday, and our President Mary McAleese, who joined the delegates when they adjourned to the RDS on Saturday evening after the conference.

Some other well known people there were Peter Sutherland, non-executive Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, previously non-executive chairman of BP and current European head of the Trilateral Commission, David Rockefeller of the famous banking and oil family, and ex-US Secretary of state Henry Kissenger, a war criminal with a warrant outstanding for atrocities perpetrated in Chile (Members of the Sovereign Independent served the Gardai with Kissingers warrant during the meeting and requested that he be arrested, only to be met with lame excuses and no effort at all to arrest him) who has been an adviser to many US presidents and is an adviser to the current one.

Visitors to this site will probably be aware that WAC members and members of the Sovereign Independent heckled both Mr. Rockefeller and President McAleese over the weekend. Many who saw the videos of these incidents know why we did this and know the effect this will have had. Many more will not and may be asking why we did it and what did we hope to achieve? Heckling people isn’t very polite, what reason did we have to do it? Some others will be wondering why we didn’t do something more effective, rather than shouting at them. Some commentators have voiced surprise, saying David Rockefeller and his family are famous philantrophists and have only done good for mankind.

So, let us explain. To begin, the first heckling incident was when WAC spotted Mr Rockefeller driving up to the door of the RDS after the conference finished up for Saturday. It was not expected so we rushed over to voice our displeasure at the man being in our city. He is after all guilty of a lot of very serious crimes, which we will have a look at later in the article. We had protested outside the hotel all day but it was a protest with a difference. We are through being afraid and cowed by these people. Enough. We went to the hotel in fancy dress, with music, and we danced and laughed, because we know how this is going to go down. We know these guys have blown it. And it’s funny, so we mocked them. We asked them what the hold up is? Where is our New World Order? Why are we waiting? Let’s get microchipped, let’s have a global currency! Hurry up and save us from all the terror, and the swine flu, and the CO2, and Bin Laden, and drugs, and Iran. And everything else the media wants us to be scared of. Save us! Please! Or are you not able to? You are taking your time about it. 1984 was a long time ago. Perhaps the wheels are falling off the wagon, eh?

Some of our number managed to get into the hotel on Saturday to see if we could get close to the delegates and ask questions. This was unlikely but we got in and we tried. Security was low key outside the hotel, just our own Gardai, but inside were a lot of large, aggressive and armed security, and there was no getting near the meeting. On Sunday Neil and Dave from the Sovereign Independent managed to get into the hotel for tea and were sitting at their table when Rockefeller came and sat at the table next to them! The guys got up and went over to his table, placed a copy of the paper in front of him on the table and told him he will never get his New World Order and that we are not his slaves. We will go over the reasons the guys would have done this in this article.

As for the effect, it has three effects. One, it will have embarrassed him, spoiled his lunch and drawn attention to him. Two, it attracted publicity to the meeting and the organisation. These people need a light shone on their activities, and confronting him at his table and getting the video on youtube is a great way to do that. Three, these guys have operated in the shadows up to now, safe in the knowledge that noone knows what they are doing. By confronting and heckling them we can put them under a bit of pressure. Rockefeller and the members of these round table groups should and will be hounded wherever they go.

Outside we chatted to our Gardai and alerted them to the nature of the meeting and its attendees, they are afterall our Gardai, payed by us to keep the peace and protect us, as opposed to high-flying, long-term rich so-called elites. The Gardai are our peace officers, not mercenaries. As such we have the greatest of respect for the Gardai and do not like to see them abused by being placed in situations where they are insulted by being used as private security for foreign money men.

We handed out a lot of papers and fliers and chatted to passers by, who were quite interested, and were amazed that such a high profile collection of people were in their city yet they didn’t know about it, the mainstream media being very quiet about it. Not mentioning it you could almost say.

We actually met some of the journalists who were there to cover the meeting when they were told to leave on Friday evening just after the Taosieach’s speech. They were quite young and quite fit we noted, as we watched them run away. When asked in mid flight what was possibly going on at the meeting, what were the topics being discussed they were, one can only say, well, vague. The North, the improving economy, that sort of thing. When asked where they were going they said they had been told the rest of the meeting, the rest of it that is from the opening speech to the end, which would be all of it, was private, and they weren’t allowed to hear it.

So that would explain the lack of coverage to a certain extent. But to properly understand the lack of coverage brings us also to properly understand the significance of this meeting and its attendees and also begins to explain our actions in showing our disapproval in any way possible.

Here is a quote from David Rockefeller from the 1991 Bilderberg meeting in Baden Germany:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

Some people dispute that Mr Rockefeller said that. We can’t say with absolute certainty, that’s the problem with secret meetings, we depend on whistle blowers telling us what went on but no-one can confirm what the whistle blower says, it’s their word we’re taking for it. So you try to get more than one whistleblower, but in an all invite, secret meeting of the world’s top people that’s not easy to do. Getting one is doing well. That, indeed, is the reason the meetings are secret, no? So that what goes on remains a secret.

So, we try to put that quote into context. Is there any backup for it? Well, yes, there is quite a lot.

He definitely said this, it’s in his autobiography ‘Memoirs’, page 405.

“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

Proud if it he is. Isn’t that nice for him. But they couldn’t be conspiring really though could they? We’d have heard about it. It’d be in the papers or on tv surely? Hmm..

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press. … They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”

Oscar Callaway
(1872-1947) U.S. Congressman, TX-D (1911-1917)

Congressional Record of February 9, 1917, page 2947, as entered by Representative Oscar Callaway of Texas.

1915. That was a long time ago. Is it likely that in the intervening time the hold over the press has become stronger or weaker? A small bit of research into the ownership of the press reveals that not only the press but all mainstream media are, today, owned almost 100% by 6 corporations. Namely General Electric, Disney, TimeWarner, Newscorp, CBS and Viacom. These 6 corporations are in turn owned by mostly the same small group of people, which includes the Rockefellers. As an example, RTÉ, the Independent and the Irish Times get an awful lot of their stories from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters is owned by the Rothschild family. Associated Press is owned by Reuters.

John D Rockefeller was financed in business by Rothschild, as was JP Morgan. In fact let us just state here that although this article is aimed at explaining why we went for Rockefeller it is not true at all that David Rockefeller is ‘running the world’. If only it were that simple. Rockefeller occupies a very important position and he and his family need to be exposed urgently, and they are being. But the act of exposing them is not to blame them for humanities woes. They are simply a large piece of the puzzle. The root of the puzzle goes to the financer of Rockefeller and Morgan; Rothschild, and it doesn’t stop there either but rather continues upwards to levels above. Many researchers have gone there and the rabbit hole gets deeper and darker and more incredible as you explore it, but for this article we’ll just stick mostly to Rockefeller. People who grasp the significance of what is occurring in our world at this moment in time, away from the endless distractions, should follow the trail for themselves, as many millions around the world now have. We will go there in another article.

‘There is no such thing, at this date of the world’s history, in America as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries
for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.”
-John Swinton,
(The former Chief of Staff for the New York Times. One of America’s best loved newspapermen. Called by his peers “The Dean of his Profession”, John was asked to give a toast before the New York Press Club, and in so doing made this monumentally important and revealing statement.)

Irish people may remember George Lee’s quote about RTE :

Brian Dobson (reading from his autocue, hence the title news ‘reader’ )to George Lee: ‘’As a commentator, as a journalist, you’ve had the freedom, if you like, to speak your mind on issues, particularly in your case on economic issues. You’re now a member of a political party, party discipline applies. Is that going to be something that you’re going to find frustrating? Or indeed are you going to continue to push the boundaries, as it were?’’

George Lee: ‘’Well now Brian I know you don’t mean that question cos I know like you that in RTE we’re not half as free to speak our minds as people think on the outside. There are plenty of constraints on people in RTE in relation to views that they express, and I have done that for 17 years…’’

Now people did and probably still will gloss over that little remark, but just consider it for a minute. Read it again. ‘’ in RTE we’re not half as free to speak our minds as people think on the outside. There are plenty of constraints on people in RTE in relation to views that they express,’’

RTE is the source most people in this country go to for their news. It’s the evening habit to watch 6-One over dinner and see whats happening in the world. Surely it’s all true? I mean, it is all true, right?

George Lee was a senior journalist in RTE, specialising, interestingly, in economic issues. Surely he was free to speak his mind? The role of a journalist is, after all, to inform the public of the facts so we can make our own minds up on whats occurring, isn’t it?

If there are constraints on what journalists can say then those constraints would presumably be enforced by their editor, and the chief editor enforces the overall editorial policy. Who is the overall editor and what informs his decisions on what can be said and what cannot? Could the Calloway quote of 1917 be relevent here?

‘’..An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.’’

When you think about it we do get an awful lot of news stories about preparedness, militarism, financial policies, seems to be all there is lately. Seems to be that life has become about preparedness, militarism and financial policies. That would be why we get so much of it in the news then one supposes, since the news just reports what’s current and whats happening in the world, whats important..

What’s the angle of these stories we get then? Preparedness is more an American thing I suppose, prepared for attack, prepared to go to war. Prepared for terrorists! We get a lot of terror stories in our media don’t we? Terror, terror, terror. So much terror we’re all terrified, and we all go along with the remedy for terrorism and terrorists and terror in general: War, and increased security.

War in foreign countries to fight the evil doers over there, and increased security everywhere, to catch the evil doers if they manage to make it over here.

Militarism: that one speaks for itself. End result: War, and increased security.

Financial policy? What is that exactly? Business, economics, employment, stocks, shares, markets. We certainly get a lot of that in the news. What is the biggest business of them all though? The most profitable and the most popular? Oil? Energy? Tourism? What’s the biggest business there is? Is it war?

War is by far and away the most profitable, by orders of magnitude.

It costs a lot of money buying all those weapons. Where does that money come from? It comes from the taxpayer, eventually, by way of repayment of the loans taken out from the banks. Governments borrow the money from the banks to pay for the weapons and then the taxpayer, us, pays back the loans, eventually. With interest of course. So, that’s a nice tidy profit for the banks then. Where does that go? Why to the shareholders, naturally, to the owners of the banks. And here’s where we start to come together and narrow in on what Mr Rockefeller and his chums have done and why we called him a scumbag in Dublin, to let him know we know what he’s doing and what he and his family and their associates and colleagues have done for a long, long time.

David’s grandaddy Mr John D Rockefeller Sr, and Mr Rothschild, and Mr Morgan, and Mr Warburg realised a long time ago how profitable war is. In fact it was Mr Mayer Rothschild and his sons in the 1700’s who realised the astronomical profits which were to be made from war, by lending money to both sides. You can’t lose. And by controlling the supply of money and influencing politicians via that money as well as through proxy agents you can also, they learned, actually direct the course of the war and choose who will win. Nice. An extra feature which works well is if in addition to owning the banks which lend the money to the warring countries you also own the manufacturing companies in which that money is subsequently spent on weapons. Now you are really coining it. And how fabulously devious if you ALSO own the mines from which the raw materials are extracted to manufacture the weapons! Now that would be some amazing set up. Imagine that. All that money. All you’d need is a war. One little war and away you’d go, wealth incalculable. Several big wars and, well, go figure, you’d be rich! Rich! Rich! War: a great way to get astronomically wealthy. Also a great way to re-order the social, political, and economic landscape to your favour.

And these guys were already very wealthy. These were the owners of banks. Then they discovered the war scam. War is a scam folks. There is no reason at all for war other than profit making by these people.

Now as if that wasn’t enough they subsequently became the oil barons, and when you really examine it they actually became the barons of all major industry. Rothschild funded Rockefeller in oil, Morgan in banking, Carnegie in steel, and the list goes on. They are major shareholders in every significant business you can imagine. The phrase monopoly men could not be applied more suitably than to these people, for that is what they are.

John D Rockefeller created the original monopoly in his Standard Oil of New Jersey and the drive of the Rockefeller family, working for and to the agenda of the Rothschild family may we stress, is world monopoly. Let me just include here for completeness that this is still not the full story, it’s still more complex than this and involves other players. But for the purposes of this article, to show people who don’t know about any of this, we will stick to the Rockefeller/monopoly angle.

To have a world monopoly you need one very important thing, and that is a World Government. A ‘one world order’, if you will. You need to have a means of implementing policies favourable to your businesses all round the globe. All countries would need to be following the same set of rules and trade agreements. Tariffs and taxes would need to be favourable, labour laws would need to be controllable. Competition would need to be controllable. Actually, competition would need to be eliminated, let’s be fully accurate here. World government controlled by the would-be monopoly holders would be essential to achieve a world monopoly.

Through control of finance these banking families, of which Rockefeller is only one, have developed a situation where they are calling the shots in the political world. Readers may disagree and that’s expected. A few years, even a few short months ago, it was hard to argue with regular people that this is the case. But now, at this moment in time, I say this to you in the hope that the time is right: Isn’t it obvious? I mean isn’t it? Isn’t it obvious that the banks are running the show? Isn’t it obvious that the politicians in almost every country and certainly in Ireland are doing their bidding? Passing laws which benefit them, keeping them out of jail, bailing them out. And all the time getting the sovereign people into greater, and greater, and greater, and greater debt.

Where is this going? I mean it can’t go on much further, something is going to have to give. Anyone with an eye in their head can see that, including the bankers who have gotten us here by various manoeuvres including repealing the Glass-Steagal act outlawing derivatives trading, and the printing of squillions of dollars out of thin air. They are not stupid folks. They do stupid things, but they are not stupid. We are told over and over that they are and its all incompetence. Doh! We crashed the economy! Doh! We never saw it coming! Doh! Who would have thought!? Doh ! Doh! Doh! Yeah, right. We need to give ourselves a shake here now, this is not incompetence. There are many, many commentators and economists who have been screaming the rafters off about whats being done, and they’ve been right. This is a deliberate economic crash, and our media don’t tell us that, same as they don’t tell us when the Trilateral boyos are in town. Why is that?

As this financial crisis continues to develop the media instead of looking deep into the heart of the problem and seeing where it’s really coming from are giving us three main themes.

Theme 1 is that there were some ‘silly bankers’ who lent money to people who couldn’t pay it back and that’s what caused the crisis. Theme 2 is that the culprits and the ones who should go to jail are the bank managers and directors and people like Bernie Madoff. Theme 3 is that the end result of the financial crisis will be riots everywhere. This theme has gone large in Greece.

Theme 1 and theme 2 fit together nicely. 1 is a problem and 2 is its solution. Put the silly bankers in jail, problem solved, apparently. Think Iceland.

Theme 3 is another problem but this one is not simple. The economic crisis has devastated economies and created huge and growing unemployment. Add to that the outrageous bailouts of the banks which are responsible and you get a very dangerous situation. You get a lot of angry people. A lot of people who are at the end of their tether. A lot of people who might be very close to losing it and going on the rampage. It’s starting to happen in Greece. People have died already. The same economic conditions exist in several other countries including Ireland. Is that going to happen here?

The media portrayal of this Greek situation would suggest it is. In fact on an RTE show a few weeks ago an ‘expert’ was heard to say ‘Why isn’t this happening in Ireland?’ It almost sounded as though he wanted it to happen. Yeah! Let’s show these bankers! Get out and riot! Let’s wreck the place! The Irish Independent carried a story about Greek protestors shouting ‘We are not the Irish! We will not sacrifice ourselves for the rich!’ Cheeky Greeks, slagging us off. Why did they pick on us? What about all the other countries like Latvia, Portugal and Spain who are in the same boat? Why single us out? And why did the Independent report that? Who owns the Independent? What meetings does the owner of the Independent attend? Where, and by whom, was he educated? Interesting questions, interesting answers. The meetings that the owner of the Independent attends are similar to the Trilateral meeting Rockefeller and Kissinger attended at the Four Seasons, the Bilderberg meetings. For many years people have been saying these meetings don’t happen and it’s all conspiracy theory. Then the hard work of activists dragged the mainstream media kicking and screaming to their keyboards and squeezed tiny little stories out of them and into the papers, which mentioned almost in passing that world and business leaders were meeting in heavily armed-guarded secrecy every year to discuss… something. To swap recipes maybe, or complement each other on how fantastic they are.

The owner of the Independent Group attends this club, but his papers never mention it. No connection there though, that’s a coincidence. Lots of Irish people read the Independent to find out what’s going on in the world. Is it likely that their knowledge of the world is complete, or incomplete? One of the main activists following these meetings as they move around the globe year by year is Daniel Estulin, who gave a speech about the Bilderbergers at a press conference in the European Parliament on June 1^st. That’s a pretty amazing thing. The very existence of this meeting was totally pooh-poohed and ridiculed by all the mainstream media for years but it’s now been presented in a speech in the EU parliament.

Here’s Estulin’s speech. There was quite a big turnout to hear him.

Here is a Guardian article by Charlie Skelton about Bilderberg, and Estulin, and a lot more. Charlie Skelton was despatched by The Guardian last year to Greece to ‘cover ‘ this non event and hopefully one presumes come back with a humorous take on the crazy community who think these meetings are important. Skelton instead came back freaked out at what was going on. He had an awful time did Charlie, chased by people, detained, questioned. Terrible. Made him think though. This year he has a great blog on the event. He is heartened to see that the Spanish police are not one bit happy with having to guard these people.

Here are clips of the protestors he mentions and the interactions with the police. Listen to what the protestors are saying. Are they crazy? Or, as Charlie says, are they really, really worried about something?

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

Arthur Schopenhauer

We are at stage three, just, and no credit for getting there goes to the mainstream media. We are at the stage now where large numbers of people are seeing what only a small number have been seeing up to now, that we’ve been set up and lied to, enormously, all our lives.

So, what happens when a populace protests and then riots? Things get ugly is what happens, and things get broken, and things get burnt, and people get hurt, and people get killed. And if the protests get really big, and the riots get big, and the protests grow more frequent and enough people join in then a revolution might happen, and the old corrupt government might get replaced with a new sparkling revolutionary movement, full of idealism and purity and valour. What happens then, historically? Well, over a period of years or decades the shiny new kids on the political block start to lose their halos of truth and justice and equality for all and they begin to grow corrupt. A natural progression most people call that, power corrupts. It happens. It’s human nature. We’re all susceptible.

The most notorious example of a revolution ending disastrously for the people was the overthrow of the Tzar in Russia. That led in short order to the reigns of Lenin and Stalin, the purges and the communist nightmare. What’s that got to do with David Rockefeller though?

‘At the turn of the century Standard Oil was competing fiercely with Royal Dutch Shell for control of the lucrative European market . Congressional testimony revealed that Rockefeller had sent large sums to Lenin and Trotsky to instigate the Communist Revolution of 1905 . His banker, Jacob Schiff, had previously financed the Japanese in their war against Russia and had sent a personal emissary, George Kennan to Russia to spend some twenty years in promoting revolutionary activity against the Czar . When the Czar abdicated, Trotsky was placed on a ship with three hundred Communist revolutionaries from the Lower East Side of New York . Rockefeller obtained a special passport for Trotsky from Woodrow Wilson and sent Lincoln Steffens with him to make sure he was returned safely to Russia . For traveling expenses, Rockefeller placed a purse containing $10,000 in Trotsky’s pocket .

On April 13, 1917, when the ship stopped in Halifax, Canadian Secret Service officers immediately arrested Trotsky and interned him in Nova Scotia . The case became an international cause celebre, as leading government officials from several nations frantically demanded Trotsky’s release . The Secret Service had been tipped off that Trotsky was on his way to take Russia out of the war, freeing more German armies to attack Canadian troops on the Western Front . Prime Minister Lloyd George hurriedly cabled orders from London to the Canadian Secret Service to free Trotsky at once–they ignored him . Trotsky was finally freed by the intervention of one of Rockefeller’s most faithful stooges, Canadian Minister Mackenzie King, who had long been a “labor specialist” for the Rockefellers . King personally obtained Trotsky’ s release and sent him on his way as the emissary of the Rockefellers, commissioned to win the Bolshevik Revolution . Thus Dr. Armand Hammer, who loudly proclaims his influence in Russia as the friend of Lenin, has an insignificant claim compared to the role of the Rockefellers in backing world Communism. Although Communism, like other isms, had originated with Marx’s association with the House of Rothschild, it enlisted the reverent support of John D. Rockefeller because he saw Communism for what it is, the ultimate monopoly, not only controlling the government, the monetary system and all property, but also a monopoly which, like the corporations it emulates, is self-perpetuating and eternal! It was the logical progression from his Standard Oil monopoly.’

Eustace Mullins

Trotsky was a Rockefeller agent, or more correctly he was a Rothschild agent. Sent in to capture the revolution, he and Lenin inserted themselves at the head of the revolutionary movement and hijacked it. The apparent contradiction in the world’s biggest capitalists being involved in creating communism is a mental paradox that many people cannot get around, and people can argue this and I expect they will, but I’m not going to argue back. Time is getting short for the people of the world now to realise that we have a big problem here. Some are going to get it, others will never get it.

As Jennings C. Wise has written, “Historians must never forget that Woodrow Wilson… made it possible for Leon Trotsky to enter Russia with an American passport.

The money masters have been behind every major event in our history. Period. They manipulate events in the public arena by buying everything and everyone they need, by blackmail, by murder and by any means necessary. It matters not to them whether its capitalism or communism, they still get their money and they still get their control.

This is hidden from the populace, and thus made possible, through control of the media. And when we say media that extends also to the publishing houses who print the majority of books, including the ones we get ‘recommendations’ for in the ‘news’ papers and magazines, and also the school books we teach our children with, books funded and selected, at least in America, by the Rockefeller Foundation.

In its report published in 1954, the Reece Committee (the Special House Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations) explained and quoted the official minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace:

“These trustees in a meeting about 1917 had the brashness to congratulate themselves on the wisdom of their original decision because already the impact of war had indicated it… could alter life in this country. … they even had the brashness to … dispatch a telegram to Mr. (Harold) Wilson, cautioning him to see that the war did not end too quickly…. (emphasis added)

“The concern became, as expressed by the trustees, seeing to it that there was no reversion to life in this country as it existed prior to 1914. And they came to the conclusion that, to prevent a reversion, they must control education, and then they approached the Rockefeller Foundation and they said, ‘Will you take on the acquisition of control of education as it involves subjects that are domestic in their significance? We’ll take on the basis of subjects that have an international significance.’ And it was agreed…. They decided the key to be the teaching of American history, and they must change that.”

Check out the history book this wide awake kid in America shows us in this video. Chapter 33: ‘America in the New World Order’.

Chapter 33 mind. Anyone who has studied the role of Freemasonry in the world will know the significance of this. Anyone who hasn’t studied it should.

There’s a famous line from American TV news: ‘Its 10PM, do you know where your children are?’ Well, how about this: ‘Its 9AM – 3PM, do you know what your children are being taught?

Getting at kids through their schoolbooks is pretty insidious. Implanting ideas, creating false realities. But they are ok when they go home and watch TV right? Cartoons, those are innocent, aren’t they?

This is one example of this stuff in cartoons, there are many, many, many more. Symbolism, subliminals, are everywhere in our mass media.

At the same time as the real truth of how the world works is hidden from us we are given the false version to advance the very real agenda which is the actual overall goal, world government, and the then possible world monopoly on not just business but on the entire lives of ordinary people. Make no mistake, a world government will not be benign. A world government will result very quickly in a world dictatorship. A nasty one, enforced by all the nasty oppressive technology thats in use all around us even now. Cameras everywhere, goons with tazers. Microchipped people? Think thats a crazy notion? People are already being microchipped. The police in Mexico are being microchipped. Its all going on folks, and if our trusty media covered it we would all know, but they don’t.

I will include some links at the end for the interested people who may be a bit concerned by the information in here so you can check for yourself whats going on and what the Rockefellers and their associates and controllers have been involved in over the years, including the horrors of WW2, and in particular the eugenics movement for race purity, an idea the Rockefellers exported to Hitlers’ Germany. These are not pleasant people.

The Wall Street financiers enabled fascism, they funded it and they supplied the ideology. And Wall Street you will note did not lose the second world war. If a world government comes about, created and run by these people, it will be fascist. It will in fact be hyper fascism on steroids. That, it shouldn’t need to be said, will be very unpleasant to live in, yet that is what’s coming for us and for our kids unless we do something about it.

Fascism is the merger of the state and corporate power according to this quote, attributed to Mussolini:

“Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power.”

That quote is very controversial however, as its original cannot be found. It is highly questionable that he said that, but does that make the statement untrue?

Consider this, from ‘Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution’, By Antony C. Sutton

‘What motive explains this coalition of capitalists and Bolsheviks?

Russia was then — and is today — the largest untapped market in the world. Moreover, Russia, then and now, constituted the greatest potential competitive threat to American industrial and financial supremacy. (A glance at a world map is sufficient to spotlight the geographical difference between the vast land mass of Russia and the smaller United States.) Wall Street must have cold shivers when it visualizes Russia as a second super American industrial giant.

But why allow Russia to become a competitor and a challenge to U.S. supremacy? In the late nineteenth century, Morgan/Rockefeller, and Guggenheim had demonstrated their monopolistic proclivities. In Railroads and Regulation 1877-1916 Gabriel Kolko has demonstrated how the railroad owners, not the farmers, wanted state control of railroads in order to preserve their monopoly and abolish competition. So the simplest explanation of our evidence is that a syndicate of Wall Street financiers enlarged their monopoly ambitions and broadened horizons on a global scale. The gigantic Russian market was to be converted into a captive market and a technical colony to be exploited by a few high-powered American financiers and the corporations under their control. What the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Federal Trade Commission under the thumb of American industry could achieve for that industry at home, a planned socialist government could achieve for it abroad — given suitable support and inducements from Wall Street and Washington, D.C…..

‘The question now in the readers’ minds must be, were these bankers also secret Bolsheviks? No, of course not. The financiers were without ideology. It would be a gross misinterpretation to assume that assistance for the Bolshevists was ideologically motivated, in any narrow sense. The financiers were power-motivated and therefore assisted any political vehicle that would give them an entree to power: Trotsky, Lenin, the tsar, Kolchak, Denikin — all received aid, more or less….

Neither was aid restricted to statist Bolsheviks and statist counter-Bolsheviks. John P. Diggins, in Mussolini and Fascism: The View from America,4 has noted in regard to Thomas Lamont of Guaranty Trust that

“Of all American business leaders, the one who most vigorously patronized the cause of Fascism was Thomas W. Lamont. Head of the powerful J.P. Morgan banking network, Lamont served as something of a business consultant for the government of Fascist Italy.”

Lamont secured a $100 million loan for Mussolini in 1926 at a particularly crucial time for the Italian dictator. We might remember too that the director of Guaranty Trust was the father of Corliss Lamont, a domestic Communist.

This evenhanded approach to the twin totalitarian systems, communism and fascism, was not confined to the Lamont family….

Ivy Lee, Rockefeller’s public relations man, made similar pronouncements, and was responsible for selling the Soviet regime to the gullible American public in the late 1920s…’

‘The financiers were without ideology. It would be a gross misinterpretation to assume that assistance for the Bolshevists was ideologically motivated, in any narrow sense. The financiers were power-motivated and therefore assisted any political vehicle that would give them an entree to power: Trotsky, Lenin, the tsar, Kolchak, Denikin — all received aid, more or less….’

They were then and they’re worse now. These guys support anybody and anything that will provide them with more power. Fascism? No problem, here, have millions of dollars. Fascism in Germany was characterised by the state taking over the corporations. In America and the rest if the western world it’s the other way around, the corporations have taken over the state. For corporations think banks, although as we will see it goes WAY deeper than that. Our governments are corporations.

So, Greek videos appeared on Youtube last month showing Greek police dressed as protestors and armed with stout wooden poles instigating violence, breaking windows and stirring up trouble on the streets of Athens.

Here are students at the G20 meeting in Pittsburgh last year totally busting 3 undercover cops, who are carrying gas canisters and trying to mingle with the protestors.

Here’s a protest at the Vancouver Olympics where violence kicks off and people start breaking up shops and street furniture, but they are not with the regular, peaceful protestors.

Are they police? Would the Canadian police do that? Yes they would, and they got caught here in this case at a Security and Prosperity Partnership protest, and they had to officially admit it.

In the news media these protests are always covered and what is always shown is violence and burning and chaos. It’s become a well known supposed fact that the way to get change through rebellion is to get out on the street with a mask on and break things and fight with the police, your own countrymen, whose wages you pay. Nice. Not very clever though.

Last month at Leinster House 40 or so protestors ‘stormed’ the gates. Watch out Ireland, things are starting to move. Who are these people? The protest was organised by Unite the Union, who are legitimate and hopefully peaceful. It was probably a token gesture, it seemed to be over quite quickly. Looking at the footage though who do we see doing the ‘storming’? The Socialist Workers Party. Hmm… Isn’t that interesting? Socialists, who aspire to a socialist state, based on socialist principles, which come from Marx, Lenin and Trotsky, who were funded and supported by Wall Street for the sole purpose of benefitting Wall Street. Do you see where I’m going with this? Leave your idealism at the door folks, this is about money and control, always.

So, what a difference a couple of years makes eh? Two years ago we were riding high on the ‘Celtic Tiger’. With capital letters, as if it was something real. The future was rosy, we were all loaded. Nothing could possibly go wrong.

Now where are we? Broke. Rising unemployment. Businesses closing all over the place. People getting angry at the government for their disaterous management of the country. What happened!?

Economic manipulation to progress an agenda happened, just like it happened at the end of the ‘roaring’ 20′s, leading to the Great Depression, in capital letters, because it was real. The banks lent out a lot of cheap money. People were urged to get into debt. The media said it was the thing to do, experts said we must get on the property ladder, everyone did. Then all of a sudden, but completely inevitably if one simply studies history, the bankers reduced the money supply, reducing the amount of credit available to the overstretched population and triggering defaults and collapse, a collapse which is still only getting going. Its not complicated. They use some bullshit excuse, in this case ‘sub-prime mortgages’, to blame poor people but the reality is that the bailout money the US simply printed out of thin air and gave to the banks would have been enough to pay off most of those troubled mortgages and fix that supposed problem. The sub-prime story is just that, a story.

In 1932, Congressman Louis T. McFadden stated before the Congress that the Federal Reserve banks are not government agencies, but;

”are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders.”

Following the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1913, Congressman Charles A. Lindebergh said,

”From now on depressions will be scientifically created.”

It goes without saying that John D. Rockefeller Sr. was one of the founders of the Federal Reserve bank, the privately owned bank which issues United States currency.

As a result of this engineered crash Ireland is, incredibly, poised to go down the Greek road and slide towards a reconing of some sort. There have been riots in Greece. If that starts to happen we have major problems. There are provocateurs in Greece, there will be provocateurs in Ireland. The reason for this economic collapse and the coverage of, and almost open encouragement towards, messy violence on the streets can be summed up in the motto of a certain secret society ‘Ordo ab chao’, Order out of chaos, and its operation is most simply explained as problem-reaction-solution. There’s a problem, the public react and demand something be done, a solution is provided. If there is no problem one is created. The goal is to enact the solution, which is marketed as beneficial to the public while in reality it is far more beneficial to the people who caused the problem in the first place.

The crash has been deliberately engineered to bring about this situation where on

the one hand people the world over get so angry that they get out on the streets and start to destroy things and on the other hand currencies the world over fail and crash. Protestors will be on the streets clashing with police, shops will burn, people will die, business will grind to a halt. The food supply could potentially stop. It could potentially be incredibly bad.

This situation will be a very, very big problem, for us all. There will be an awful mess. Everyone will want it fixed. The solution that will be offered to fix this economic mess will have to be a different economic monetary system. The old system we will be told failed because it was not centralised! There were too many currencies, too many banks! Too many rogues, too many areas in which ‘bad apples’ could get in and destroy it through their personal greed and recklessness. We will not be told that the system has functioned perfectly in that it has done what it was designed to do, enrich the owners and then crash. The solution we will be told will be a global currency! Bingo, that will solve all our problems! One global currency, issued by a global central bank. We will be told to stop rioting, calm down, let the bankers and politicians work on the solution, let them get it done as quickly as possible! Order must be restored, for the sake of us all!

This brings us to last month’s events in Dublin. The first piece of ambush journalism we got was on the Friday, when three of our members managed to get some quite amazing information from a delegate leaving the Trilateral Commission. This gentleman confirmed to them on tape what we already knew, that the meeting was to discuss a plan for the world. Drawn on the need for a global currency in light of the Greek mess he basically said in no uncertain terms that yes, a global currency would be best, but if you have a global currency you need a global central bank to control it and to regulate the global bank and the global currency system you would need a global government. He said that that’s what they all want.

[Update: A paper entitled "Reserve Accumulation and International Monetary Stability" by the Strategy, Policy and Review Department of the IMF recommends that the world adopt a global currency called the "Bancor" and that a global central bank be established to administer that currency. The report is dated April 13, 2010 and a full copy can be read here.]

He further said that that is not possible with countries like Iran and North Korea refusing to play ball. Iran and North Korea might not be ideal folks but make no mistake, the problem is not nuclear weapons or support for terrorism, it’s that they know the agenda and they don’t want any part in it. They are also two of the last remaining countries which do not have a central bank in private hands in control of their currency, as we do. Iran and North Korea are in the way of the agenda and that is not a good place to be. This plan is old and a lot of effort has gone into it and woe betide anyone who stands in its way, they are for the chop. By the way, two countries which until recently did not have a central bank but which now do are? Can you guess? One starts with ‘I’ and the other starts with ‘A’. Isn’t that coincidental.

From the horse’s mouth folks, here’s the audio.

Of course he could be wrong, he could be a plant. We could have taken him up wrong. It could all be completely innocent. So to try to get some context lets look at the Trilateral Commission. What is this Trilateral Commission and why were they meeting, and what are they actually doing?

The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller, Zbignieu Brezinski and others in 1973.

It is a sister group to the highly influential Council on Foreign Relations, an all American group that counts amongst its members just about everyone of note in each successive presidential regime including the President, members of Congress, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Supreme Court Justices, members of the Federal Reserve, the heads of media, business leaders and unpleasant characters such as Henry Kissinger, who’s decisions have murdered millions.

The Council on Foreign Relations is a many volume study in itself so deep goes this rabbit hole and in studying the Council one must go back to the Round Table group started by Cecil Rhodes with the aim of federating the English speaking peoples of the world and bringing them under one rule, to the establishment of the Federal Reserve banking system, and to WW1 and the Treaty of Versailles.

An excellent article was written by William Blase entitled : ‘The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and The New World Order’ and I quote that article here:

‘The League of Nations was established, but it, and the plan for world government, eventually failed because the U.S. Senate would not ratify the Versailles Treaty.

Pat Robertson, in “The New World Order,” states that Colonel (Mandell) House, along with other internationalists, realized that America would not join any scheme for world government without a change in public opinion.

After a series of meetings, it was decided that an “Institute of International Affairs”, with two branches, in the United States and England, would be formed.

The British branch became known as the Royal Institute of International Affairs, with leadership provided by members of the Round Table. Begun in the late 1800′s by Cecil Rhodes, the Round Table aimed to federate the English speaking peoples of the world, and bring it under their rule.

The Council on Foreign Relations was incorporated as the American branch in New York on July 29, 1921. Founding members included Colonel House, and “… such potentates of international banking as J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff … the same clique which had engineered the establishment of the Federal Reserve System,” according to Gary Allen in the October 1972 issue of “AMERICAN OPINION.”

The founding president of the CFR was John W. Davis, J.P. Morgan’s personal attorney, while the vice-president was Paul Cravath, also representing the Morgan interests. Professor Carroll Quigley characterized the CFR as “… a front group for J.P. Morgan and Company in association with the very small American Round Table Group.” Over time Morgan influence was lost to the Rockefellers, who found that one world government fit their philosophy of business well. As John D. Rockefeller, Sr. had said: “Competition is a sin,” and global monopoly fit their needs as they grew internationally. ‘

The full paper can be read here.

I would recommend everyone who is looking at current events and asking ‘But why would they do that? How can they be so incompetent?? What kind of fools are these people?? What is going to happen??’ to read it, and to study the CFR, Trilateral Commission and New World Order.

For an in depth explanation of the CFR, Trilateral and their beginnings and aims read Dr Carol Quigley’s book ‘Tragedy and Hope.‘

This has all been planned for a long time folks, it’s a very big, multi-generational scheme to create a global monopoly and it needs a world government to achieve it. That’s where we’re going, and the people doing it are not doing it to create a world of peace love and joy for all men. They are doing it for them, the people who start all our wars for profit, who keep Africa poor, who sicken us with pharmaceuticals and dumb us down via their media. These people are the ones who started the eugenics movement, the idea of race purity. To list what these people have done to us would take volumes. The information is never presented to us in our media but it is all available and we encourage you to take some time and look for yourself.

If you read the above article you will have an appreciation for what the CFR is and who its members are. The Trilateral Commission’s American members are almost entirely CFR members, as the Trilateral is in reality an expansion of the CFR and its principles and aims into Europe and the East, originally just Japan but as the Trilateral website tells us the member ship has grown well beyond Japan now:

There are 390 members of the Trilateral Commission today—160 from Europe, 120 from North American, and 110 from Pacific Asia. They are distinguished leaders in business, media, academia, public service (excluding current national government leaders), labor unions, and other non-governmental organizations from the three regions. The regional chairmen, deputy chairmen, and directors constitute the leadership of the Trilateral Commission, along with an Executive Committee including about 45 other members.

The Japanese Group of 85 members expanded in 2000 to become the Pacific Asian Group and now includes over 100 members from Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and the original five ASIAN countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand). Triennium Participants from the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan have also participated.

The Commission recently began admitting members from China and India.

The European Group, which includes members from Austria, Belgium/Luxembourg, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, now has a ceiling of 170 members, which is divided into national quotas. Germany has a quota of 20; France, Italy, and the United Kingdom each have a quota of 18; and Spain has a quota of 12. The remaining national quotas range from 6 to 1.

The Commission recently began admitting members from China and India.

The ceiling for the North American Group is 120, including 20 Canadian members, 13 Mexican members and 87 U.S. members.

From their website:

The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Japan, Europe (European Union countries), and North America (United States and Canada) to foster closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system.

The “growing interdependence” that so impressed the founders of the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s has deepened into “globalization.” That

Change we can believe in. Frying pan to fire is a change too, he never promised the change would be positive. Actually hold on, he DID! Liar. Criminal. CFR member.

interdependence also has ensured that the current financial crisis has been felt in every nation and region. It has fundamentally shaken confidence in the international system as a whole. The Commission sees in these unprecedented events a stronger need for shared thinking and leadership by the Trilateral countries, who (along with the principal international organizations) have been the primary anchors of the wider international system. Doubts about whether and how this primacy will change do not diminish, and, if anything, have intensified the need to take into account the dramatic transformation of the international system. As relations with other countries become more mature—and power more diffuse—the leadership tasks of the original Trilateral countries need to be carried out with others to an increasing extent.

As our conviction has strengthened that the Commission remains more important than ever in helping our countries fulfill their shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system, we too have changed. Our membership has widened to reflect broader changes in the world. Thus, the Japan Group has become a Pacific Asian Group, including in 2009 both Chinese and Indian members. Mexican members have been added to the North American Group. The European Group continues to widen in line with the enlargement of the EU. We are also continuing in this triennium our practice of inviting a number of participants from other key areas.

As we stated at the beginning of this article the meetings of the Trilateral Commission are secret. The members are invited, the press are not, and Chatham House rules apply, meaning that the members and attendees can speak their minds safe in the knowledge that what they say will not have any negative repercussions for them and will not be made known to the public. The reason given for this is that it allows for honest and genuine debate and that is certainly true. However, secrecy has one fundamental property that our media never seem to worry about and that is that no matter who the secret keeper is, at what time, location or circumstance in the affairs of men, secrets exist to benefit those who know the secret to the detriment of those who don’t. Period.

Here’s a very interesting speech given by a very well known guy about secrecy. He’s dead now of course, but thats a coincidence.

People dismiss this speech as evidence of a banker/elite conspiracy by saying that he was referring to the Soviet Union, a different conspiracy. I would respond by pointing out the roots of the Soviet Union as covered earlier in this article and say, sorry, but it’s not a different conspiracy, you need to zoom out to see this picture, its big.

Those who know the secrets in the case of the Trilateral Commission, CFR and Round Table groups are the members of those groups. Those who don’t know the secrets are us. We, the ones kept in the dark, are told that these groups are working towards a better world. Better for who? For us? If they wanted our condition to improve it would be very simple; stop extracting our hard earned money as profit and our circumstances would improve enormously. Stop destroying our planet for profit. Stop putting a price tag on everything. Stop starting wars for bullshit reasons, killing innocents, and blaming some bogey men they created in the first place. Stop lying. And stop the damn oil gushing into the Gulf.

All these things are quite obviously not part of their plan. If they were part of the plan then they would happen. Do we see any signs of them happening? No, there is no sign of anything beneficial for us or the Earth coming from these crazy people, so obviously their plan is a different plan. Their plan is to increase their profits, their increased profits providing them with increased power, their increased power allowing them to increase their profits even more and the overall move resulting in their much desired global monopoly over all business and a world government, run by them, to ensure that they cannot be removed. Ever. And planet and people be damned.

Is this all true? Is a world government on the agenda at these meetings? As we have stated earlier we can’t know for sure since the meetings are secret. Perhaps there is some support for the theory of an agenda for world government in the remarks of others, of politicians, and people of note? Worth a look, maybe some people over the years have let the cat out of the bag or dropped a hint. Maybe some people of note have been alarmed upon discovering such an agenda and have blown the whistle.

Researchers who look for evidence of this type are universally blown away by the sheer amount of it. There is so much corroboration of the plan for world government from famous political figures speaking out that it comes into stark relief that we are being led a merry dance. If our mainstream media ever printed the quotes of people concerned about the drive for world government it could never succeed. People read Time, and the Times, and the Washington Post, and the Economist, and the FT etc and get their information from there. What do they say about the Trilateral Commission?

“It does not run the world,” says Time magazine Editor-at-Large Strobe Talbott, who’s been a Trilateralist for at least six years.

From: Beware the Trilateral Commission! The Influential World Panel Conspiracy Theorists Love to Hate The Washington Post, April 25, 1992, David Mills, Washington Post Staff Writer

Strobe Talbott: Rhodes scholar in 1968, American diplomat, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State (1994-2001) and Time Magazine Editor-at-Large, Foreign Affairs journalist and President of the Brookings Institution. So, no conflict of interest there then. What did David Rockefeller say in 1991 again?

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”

Here’s another Strobe Talbot quote:

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

Strobe Talbot, President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.

Nice, Strobe, thank you for that sentiment. Just to be clear here on the significance of Talbot being a Rhodes scholar, Rhodes is the guy who started the first Round Table group, from where the CFR and Trilateral spring.

According to Dr. Quigley, “ by the middle 1890′s Rhodes had a personal income of at least a million pounds sterling a year (then about five million dollars) which was spent so freely for his mysterious purposes…his desire to federate the English-speaking peoples and to bring all the habitable portions of the world under their control…leaving part of his great fortune to fund the Rhodes Scholarships at Oxford in order to spread the English ruling class tradition throughout the English-speaking world’

Strobe Talbot is far from an impartial commentator, and neither is the magazine he is editor in chief of, Time.

What about one of the Trilateral Commission founders?

“…This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of “one world government….National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept…”

Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter, advisor to President Obama, architect of the Afghan-Russian war.

Interesting, very interesting. What about a lot of other people then, let’s see.

“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.”

U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976, killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets

“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”

Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member James Warburg (of the Warburg banking family) to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17th, 1950

“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support.

“The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power.

“The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.”

Curtis Dall, FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book, My Exploited Father-in-Law

“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”

A letter written by FDR to Colonel Mandel House, November 21st, 1933

“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.”

Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time (Macmillan Company, 1966,) Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University, highly esteemed by his former student, William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.

“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.”

Former Congressman John Rarick 1971

“We are not going to achieve a New World Order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”

- Arthur Schlesinger Jr., ‘The CFR Journal Foreign Affairs’, August 1975.

“A world government can intervene militarily in the internal affairs of any nation when it disapproves of their activities.”

– Kofi Annan, U.N. Secretary General

“The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down…but in the end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than the old fashioned frontal assault.”

CFR member Richard Gardner, writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR’s journal, Foreign Affairs.

“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”

Harpers, July 1 1958

“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.”

Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)

“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.’”

Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York, in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite: Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order” — The New York Times (February 1962)

“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.”

Part of full-page advertisement by the government of Morocco in The New York Times (April 1994)

‘Great nations are simply the operating fronts of behind-the-scenes, vastly ambitious individuals who had become so effectively powerful because of their ability to remain invisible while operating behind the national scenery.

Buckminster Fuller

‘The Rockefeller Foundation and the Council on Foreign Relations … intend to prevent, if they can, a repetition of what they call in the vernacular “the debunking journalistic campaign following World War I.” Translated into precise English, this means that the Foundation and the Council do not want journalists or any other persons to examine too closely and criticize too freely the official propaganda and official statements relative to “our basic aims and activities” during World War II. In short, they hope that, among other things, the policies and measures of Franklin D. Roosevelt will escape in the coming years the critical analysis, evaluation and exposition that befell the policies and measures of Woodrow Wilson and the Entente Allies after World War I.’

Charles Austin Beard

‘The sovereignty fetish is still so strong in the public mind, that there would appear to be little chance of winning popular assent to American membership in anything approaching a super-state organization. Much will depend on the kind of approach which is used in further popular education.’

Council on Foreign Relations

‘There is a de facto “secret government” operating nationally and internationally and involved in the highest circles of the U.S. government, exercising an impact over domestic policies and economics ranging between extreme influence to, at times, outright control. This extreme influence to outright control naturally includes the Presidency. The de facto “secret government,” much of whose intellectual—and financial—muscle are to be found in the New York office of the CFR, the great tax-free foundations, and certain international firms and corporations.’

Mike Culbert

‘Television was our chief tool in selling our policy.’

Richard Haass

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities states and nation. At the head is a small group of banking houses generally referred to as ‘international bankers.’ This little coterie… run our government for their own selfish ends. It operates under cover of a self-created screen…[and] seizes…our executive officers… legislative bodies… schools… courts… newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.

John F. Hylan

‘The interests behind the Bush Administration, such as the CFR, The Trilateral Commission — founded by Brzezinski for David Rockefeller — and the Bilderberger Group, have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens.’

Dr. Johannes B. Koepp

“Sarah, if the American people had ever known the truth about what we Bushes have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched.”

George Bush Senior speaking in an interview with Sarah McClendon in December 1992

‘Those who formally rule take their signals and commands not from the electorate as a body, but from a small group of men (plus a few women). This group will be called the Establishment. It exists even though that existence is stoutly denied. It is one of the secrets of the American social order. … A second secret is the fact that the existence of the Establishment — the ruling class — is not supposed to be discussed.’
Arthur S. Miller

‘In 1891, [Cecile] Rhodes organized members in a “Circle of Initiates” and an outer circle known as the “Association of Helpers” later organized as the Round Table organization. In 1909-1913, they organized semi-secret groups known as Round Table Groups in the chief British dependencies and the United States. In 1919, they founded the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Similar Institutes of International Affairs were established in the chief British dominions and the United States where it is known as the Council on Foreign Relations. After 1925, the Institute of Pacific Relations was set up in twelve Pacific area countries. They were constantly harping on the lessons to be learned from the failure of the American Revolution and the success of the Canadian federation of 1867 and hoped to federate the various parts of the empire and then confederate the whole with the United Kingdom. … There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known.’
Carroll Quigley

‘Everything is in place – after 500 years – to build a true ‘new world’ in the Western Hemisphere… And what happens if we don’t pass NAFTA? I truly don’t think that ‘criminal’ would be too strong a word for rejecting NAFTA.’
David Rockefeller, Wall Street Journal, 1993

‘A careful examination of what is happening behind the scenes reveals that all of these interests are working in concert with the masters of the Kremlin in order to create what some refer to as a “New World Order.” Private organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Trilateral Commission, the Dartmouth Conference, the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies, the Atlantic Institute, and the Bilderberg Group serve to disseminate and to coordinate the plans for this so-called new world order in powerful business, financial, academic, and official circles.’
Jesse Helms

‘A clique of US industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. … Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there.’
William E. Dodd

‘You know, by the time you become the leader of a country, someone else makes all the decisions. … You may find you can get away with virtual presidents, virtual prime ministers, virtual everything.’
Bill Clinton

‘I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilized world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.’
Woodrow Wilson

‘A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is privately concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men who, even if their action be honest and intended for the public interest, are necessarily concentrated upon the great undertakings in which their own money is involved and who necessarily, by very reason of their own limitations, chill and check and destroy genuine economic freedom.’
Woodrow Wilson

‘History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling the money and its issuance.’

James Madison

“To achieve world government, it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, loyalty to family traditions, national patriotism, and religious dogmas.”

Brock Adams, Director UN Health Organization

“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis mine], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”

Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.”

New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922

“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”

Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”

Benjamin Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in 1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation

“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”

Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)

And on and on and on we could go with many more similar quotes.

Are all these people deluded? What the hell are they talking about?? These people are all well known men who have been prominent in our world, who have been in power. Prime Ministers, Presidents, and they are all saying the same thing. Is there really a secret agenda at work to form a world government? An agenda which is old, which spans many generations, which is evil in intent and which relies on ‘covert means’ to acheive its aims? ‘Covert means’, such as secret meetings of top world movers and shakers which go unreported in our press? Meetings such as the Trilateral Commission and the Bilderberg group?

There is folks. There really is. And this is a problem.

But there is a solution to every problem.

In fact several different solutions exist, each remedying a different aspect of the current mess we are in, the result of hundreds of years of manipulation, deception, theft and genocide. So if this article is freaking you out, if this is all new to you, don’t be disheartened. We the people are not having this anymore, it’s going to stop. But we need everyone to see what’s going on, to snap out of the illusion and help us rectify this mess. We will get to the solutions towards the end of this post, and cover them further in subsequent articles. Before that however I feel it is important to go over some more information regarding Rockefeller, his bosses, what they have done and this whole mess we are in.

In part 3 we presented a lot of quotes by noted people to support our view that there is an agenda of the worlds power elite to create a one world government, one which we believe will be extremely unpleasant. We believe it will be fascist and we believe it is almost here. But quotes are all well and good, is there any other evidence of this plan, any real, physical evidence? And why are we so sure a world government would be fascist? Maybe it’ll be great, maybe it’s a fantastic idea? There’d be no more war if we were all one big happy global family!

Let’s look briefly at the first point, real evidence of a one world plan. Let’s look at the EU, as it is the model for the global version of what these people are working towards.

What’s been done in Europe has already started in the Americas with NAFTA and in Asia with ASEAN and in Africa with the African Union. The EU was supposed to be a free trade area, remember that? To make trade easier between nations. It was also to ensure no more wars on the European continent, which of course is an excellent idea and we have no problems with that one. But look at the EU now. I’m even calling it the EU, because it has ‘become’. It’s effectively a federal superstate, with its own currency and its own constitution and who knows what else? What else was hidden in the unreadable Lisbon Treaty document which we apparently voted yes to? Did anyone read it? The Lisbon Treaty is a contract. Rule number one in business is ‘Never, ever, sign a contract you have not read’. People who do that lose all their money and go out of business very quickly. We listened to ‘experts’ on the TV and in the papers who supposedly read it for us since it was too complex for us simple folk to understand. We also listened to ‘Generation Yes’, some attractive, clueless, students who were paid to campaign for a yes vote.

Why was the treaty so complex? Couldn’t they have written it in a less complex fashion if it suited them? Was it so complex so that we wouldn’t read it? Of course it was. Are the people who wrote it elected? Of course they aren’t.

[Update: 11/11/2010: One of the unelected people in Europe, European President Herman Van Rumpuy (no, I'd never heard of him either before he was suddenly brought forward and made president) has made some very interesting statements about the EUand nation states. Here are sections from a Daily Mail article:

I’m not against the idea of an integrated Europe, it’s just that as with everything else we the people are sold the idea, but we never get it. Europe, the European project, is a product of the same international banking cartel that I have been referring to in this article. A document from the 1955 Bilderberg meeting [ed note: this link appears to be broken, here are a couple of others to the same document, Bilderberg 1955 1, Bilderberg 1955 2 ] released by Wikileaks reveals that at that meeting they were discussing European integration and the need for a common currency way back then. Are we to believe that these people, who happen to be the top people, discuss these things and then a bit later they happen by accident? Who brings these things in nationally if not the leaders and top people of each country, the same people who attend these meetings? Paul Watson put it nicely in an article about this leaked document:

‘’to suggest that an event that attracts the titans of government, industry, banking, business and academia, at which the most pressing global issues of the day are vigorously discussed under the cloak of a mutually agreed media blackout, has no bearing on future world events, is the most laughable “conspiracy theory” ever uttered.’’

They were discussing the common currency in 1955, ‘they’ being the people running things. It cannot be unconnected that the common currency subsequently came about. Now granted a common currency seems like a great idea, it’s so convenient, no more chopping and changing when travelling in Europe. But it’s come with a lot of baggage, it needs lots of financial gurus to control it and regulate it. It requires ever increasing EU intervention in our economic policies, to the point that a few weeks ago it was announced in the media that national budgets would henceforth have to be submitted to the EU for approval. Come again? We have to get approval of our national budget from the EU? The word ‘submit’ means to beg, to go cap in hand to your master and beg. And now our common currency is in danger of failing! Its still only new and already this ‘fantastic idea’ has all by accident got us all in indescribable debt and is now looking like it’s going to collapse! We only got the damn euro in 2002! How can this be happening??? Has this got something to do with it?

“We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.” David Rockefeller, 1994 at a U.N. dinner:

“Whoever controls the volume of money in our country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.” President James A. Garfield, the 20th President of the United States (who lasted only 100 days) two weeks before he was assassinated.

Garfield was assassinated, it has been suggested, because he was going to return the power to issue currency to the government, where it is supposed to be, as opposed to the privately owned banks. Other presidents who planned to do this were: Lincoln, assassinated by a lone madman acting alone, McKinley, shot by a lone madman acting alone, and Kennedy, assassinated by a lone madman, acting alone. Yeah, right. Its wakey, wakey time people.

It really, really is now, it’s time to really open our eyes and take a moment to shake the fuzz away. This stuff is obvious. When you switch off the programmed false reality we’ve been fed all our lives and just look at the facts it’s obvious. These guys are serially abusing us and it’s got to stop now. If we don’t stop it it won’t ever be stopped, and we will go down in history as the idiots who let a group of pathetic old fascists ruin our beautiful journey. When we get out from under these peoples oppression folks we can go into an existence of our own choosing, finally. There is nothing to stop us, our potential is infinite. We are the ones who create art and music and beauty and love. These are the guys who put a price tag on it. Enough is enough.

Second point, maybe a global government would be a good idea? Maybe it’d be great? Maybe, but it depends on who’s in charge of it really doesn’t it? The reality is that the people pushing for this situation are the people who funded the Nazi party, i.e. the Wall Street financiers. Read Webster Tarpleys ‘George Bush, the unauthorised biography’ for full and referenced details of this. George H W Bush’s daddy Prescott, working for these financiers, had his assets seized in 1942 for trading with the enemy. Financier Fritz Thyssen channelled enormous sums of money to the Nazi party through Bush’s bank, Union Banking Corp. Anthony C Suttons’ book ‘Wall Street and the rise of Hitler’ also covers this in depth, and amazingly even the Guardian covered these extraordinary facts in an article in 2004 entitled ‘How Bush’s grandfather helped Hitler’s rise to power’.

How can a man, G. W. Bush, be elected president of the United States

when his grandfather did these things? How can his Father ALSO be elected to the same position? What would have been the position of Bush’s run for presidency had the mainstream media jumped on this information like they did for John Kerry’s did-he-didn’t-he swift boat war story?

General Smedley Butler, America’s most decorated war hero, was recruited in 1933 by Wall Street financiers to head a fascist coup in America. Being a man of honour he went along with the plan for a period of time then blew the whistle, resulting in the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional Committee, which found that what he claimed was true. Foll0w the link, or Google it, this is true, and it’s the very tip of the iceberg. Here’s a BBC Radio 4 program about it. It would be great if the BBC put information like this on primetime tv, but kudos to the makers of this program nonetheless.

These are incredibly evil people folks. The media at the time ridiculed the notion, a New York Times editorial characterizing it as a “gigantic hoax”. When the committee’s final report was released however, the Times said the committee

“purported to report that a two-month investigation had convinced it that General Butler’s story of a Fascist march on Washington was alarmingly true” and,

“It also alleged that definite proof had been found that the much publicized Fascist march on Washington, which was to have been led by Major. Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired, according to testimony at a hearing, was actually contemplated.” But then the story just fizzled away, they dropped it. FDR essentially let the men off on condition that they back his New Deal. The men involved were the top industrialists at the time. J. P. Morgan was involved, Prescott Bush was involved. Were the Rockefellers involved? Considering the pedegree of those named it would be a stretch to think they were not. All these industrialists/bankers did and still do act together. If there was a fascist coup in the offing the Rockefellers would not have been out of the loop.

David Rockefeller may look like some to be a frail old man but that image of him would fade if people realised that this is the patriarch of the family whose Standard Oil company was so intertwined with the giant chemical company IG Farben as to be inseparable. IG Farben was the company which produced the zyklon B gas used in the Nazi death camps. Standard Oil was the company that supplied the technology to allow the Nazis to produce synthetic oil, which was what allowed them to power their war machine. Without Rockefellers Standard Oil and the finance supplied by Wall Street there would not have been a Nazi war machine.

“These companies, not the lunatic Nazi fanatics, are the main war criminals. If the guilt of these criminals is not brought to daylight and if they are not punished, they will pose a much greater threat to the future peace of the world than Hitler if he were still alive.” – Telford Taylor, US-Chief Prosecutor, 1947 Nuremberg War Trial against the managers of IG Farben.

A post-war investigation by the U.S, War Department concluded that:

Without I. G.’s immense productive facilities, its intense research, and vast international affiliations, Germany’s prosecution of the war would have been unthinkable and impossible; Farben not only directed its energies toward arming Germany, but concentrated on weakening her intended victims, and this double-barreled attempt to expand the German industrial potential for war and to restrict that of the rest of the world was not conceived and executed “in the normal course of business.” The proof is overwhelming that I. G. Farben officials had full prior knowledge of Germany’s plan for world conquest and of each specific aggressive act later undertaken …

From ‘Wall Street and the rise of Hitler’, by Anthony C Sutton:

‘Directors of Farben firms (i.e., the “I. G. Farben officials” referred to in the investigation) included not only Germans but also prominent American financiers. This 1945 U.S. War Department report concluded that I.G.’s assignment from Hitler in the prewar period was to make Germany self-sufficient in rubber, gasoline, lubricating oils, magnesium, fibers, tanning agents, fats, and explosives. To fulfill this critical assignment, vast sums were spent by I.G. on processes to extract these war materials from indigenous German raw materials – in particular the plentiful German coal resources. Where these processes could not be developed in Germany ,they were acquired from abroad under cartel arrangements. For example, the process for iso-octane, essential for aviation fuels, was obtained from the United States, … in fact entirely [from] the Americans and has become known to us in detail in its separate stages through our agreements with them [Standard Oil of New Jersey] and is being used very extensively by us.4 The process for manufacturing tetra-ethyl lead, essential for aviation gasoline, was obtained by I. G. Farben from the United States, and in 1939 I.G. was sold $20 million of high-grade aviation gasoline by Standard Oil of New Jersey.’

Standard Oil of New Jersey, the original business of the Rockefellers, built by John D. Snr, enabled by the Rothschilds. Any global control arrangement these people will create folks will be a regime so abhorrent that the entire planet will retch. These are scum, and they are working for worse scum. They are getting away with this simply because they own the media. They present us with our news, their papers and magazines recommend our reading material to us, their movies warp our perception of reality and of history. And, most perniciously, their funding, foundations and scholarships influence our school and university sylabii. The clue is in the word, ‘his-story’ and everyone will tell you wisely that ‘his-story’ is written by ‘him’, the victor. Yes, it is, and these guys always win, because the game is rigged from the get go, every time. History didn’t stop being written by the victors a couple of hundred years ago.

“Think of the press as a great keyboard on which the government can play.” — Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister.

They have us for fools, endlessly concentrating on the supposed important stories of the day whilst never allowing us to see the actual workings of the world. That’s why current affairs makes no sense folks, because we aren’t seeing the full picture. Sun Tzu wrote in ‘The Art of War’ that one of the rules of war is ‘Make your enemy do pointless things’. Clever bloke was Sun Tzu. By expending our energy debating whether the party on the left or the party on the right will solve our problems we never realise that the hand that gives is above the hand that receives, and both parties are ultimately working for the same paymaster. Our currencies are supplied by the central banks, which are private corporations, owned by the international financiers, including the Rockefellers. They control the money, they control the governments. Period. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild dynasty, even said as much

‘Give me control of a nation’s money supply and I care not who makes its laws.’

Their agenda is in full swing, in fact so blatant has it become that it could only be more obvious if they just came out and admitted it. But wait, they have done, over, and over, and over again. There are so many instances of world leaders calling for a ‘New World Order’, there are so many quotes of them saying what they are doing, and there is so much evidence in the form of treaties, pacts, international institutions and bodies, international banking corporations and the current economic crisis which will be used to force us into a global currency that all that’s missing is for our media to tell us what’s actually happening. But they won’t, so it’s up to normal people like us to get out and shout and speak the truth. If you don’t think this could be true have a look at what happened on the Pat Kenny show when someone brought up the Trilateral commission. Watch Pat’s reaction.

Pat Kenny signs off saying ‘Good night from us here on the front line’. He’s on the front line alright, which side of it though?

Unlike RTE we went to the Four Seasons to see what was going on and to show Rockefeller and Kissinger and their cronies that we are not afraid of them, to show them that we know, and to raise the alarm. These people have been operating in the shadows of calculated deceit up until now. They have achieved everything thus far by controlling the information. But that information is now pouring forth in torrents, and there is an unstoppable tidal wave of truth heading for these parasites. The game is up, and we wanted to let Rockefeller know.

Because of their manipulation of the global money supply we are now in a situation in this country where we can actually expect a revolution. That is an incredible thing to contemplate, and the consequences of it happening are terrifying, yet this is actually happening. The Dail was nearly stormed last month, two days after the Trilateral meeting. How coincidental, and how telling that none of those involved showed up at the Trilateral meeting to protest. Do they not know? What was the plan had they succeeded in getting into the Dail? Burn it? Burn the banks? Arrest people? Kill people? This is serious business people, and if the would-be revolutionaries don’t understand the problem then whatever apparent solution they are going to offer will be more of the same only under new leadership. These people capture violent revolutions. It’s a part of what they do.

Here’s the TV3 news report of it. Looks like a big deal.

Here’s another clip of it. Not such a big deal, compared to the thousands of peaceful people who were there peacefully all day. But once it goes out on the evening news and its thrown in with the Greek riots it becomes a lot more. This was staged, look at the second clip. Its the Socialist Workers party and it lasted about twenty seconds, with the ‘stormers’ looking around every few seconds at the cameras.

This was the Monday after the Trilateral meeting, how coincidental. Gordon Brown stepped down during the Trilateral meeting, how coincidental. David Cameron is now the UK leader. Will the policy of the UK government be any different? Of course it won’t. The euro took a nose dive during the Trilateral meeting, how coincidental. These international financiers of course had nothing to do with that, they only control the money, what effect could they have? Our media would have us believe that someone with a fat finger pressed the wrong button and sent the Dow down 1000 points in 10 mins. We are being had for incredible fools, and the time has come to man up and admit it, so that together we can stop this agenda. They have created this economic crisis by controlling the money supply and they have pushed and ruined us to the point where we will take no more. And they have implanted in us the belief that the only way to change this is to get violent. The riot squad, and we must assume the army, are getting ready for it. It’s on. Do we really want to go down this road?

RTE’s coverage of the Dail incident only showed the violence, it didn’t show that the vast majority of the protestors were peaceful and they didn’t broadcast any of the speeches given, like this one by John Bisset.

The image sent around the country and the world by the media is of an angry violent mob, which will put peaceful people off attending further protests and give impetus to people who do want to riot, out of anger and rage and out of misdirection. Anger is understandable, but the best revenge is success. We need to get rid of these crooks, but it needs to be done the smart way, once and for all. Order from chaos is their motto and if there is no chaos they create it so that they can then provide the order. We must not fall into the trap of allowing their engineered chaos to happen, their game plan depends on it, just look at the increased security all over the world. They have set this battle up for us. It’s a trap. The Greeks were apparently chanting ‘We are not the Irish’. Well they’re right, and we’re not the Greeks, and the Spaniards are not the Germans and the French are not the English. We are all different, sovereign, nations, and we don’t need this integrated EU and future integrated world, this New World Order. It was fine the way it was, and the only reason we embarked on this road was for peace and better economies. Well the economy has failed, there is potential revolution all round, and the powers that be are at war constantly, against all our wishes, and now want to attack Iran. (Nobel Peace Prize winning president Barrack Obama just sent more warships to the Gulf.

And the ‘no more war’ argument for further integration becomes irrelevant when we understand that these guys are the ones who start the wars. There would be NO wars if they were removed from the controls.

“If my sons did not want wars, there would be none.” Gutele Schnaper, Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s wife, before her death.

Any person on the street knows this globalisation we are being force fed doesn’t work. The only ones saying it does are those who are pushing it and profiting from it and their whore media. This globalisation which we are told is so fantastic has ruined Europes industry, moving it massively to the developing world and China. We gripe about Eastern European migrant workers taking our jobs when it’s the European and governmental policies that brought that situation about that are to blame. And the reasons for those policies include aggravating people and stirring racism and xenophobia, it’s all part of engineering violent chaos. Look at Northern England, Bradford for example. If we revolt violently and the media beam those images round the world we could potentially contribute to a domino effect, setting an example for other countries such as Portugal, Spain, Latvia. Ireland right now is at the most pivotal point in its history. What we do now will be watched by the world. What are the options?

Option 1: Storm the Dail and have violence.

Hmm.. messy, not ideal at all, people will get hurt, shades of the civil war, with Irishman fighting Irishman, not good. In fact folks, let’s just say this; we have had 800 years of violence and oppression in our history now. Have we not grown culturally and intellectually to the point where we can come up with a clever solution, an actual, lasting solution?

Option 2. Peaceful protest.

300,000 people or more go to Dublin and sit until the government get out and fly their fat asses to some country where they will be welcome. If they love Brussels so much they can all go there, as long as they leave.

What then? In both option 1 and 2 a new government of some description gets installed. This is very problematic, since it’s not the people in the positions that are the problem, it’s the whole system. Even if fantastically well meaning people form a new government, without infiltration, it absolutely will not last. Also, what about the debt? What do we do about the debt? Whoever gets in Ireland will still apparently ‘owe’ the bankers billions. The debt is so big and growing that it won’t be possible to pay it, same as most countries debts now. This debt is ridiculous. This debt is a problem.

Option 3. Is there an option 3?

Option 3 does exist. It requires us to look at the root of this big series of problems. To understand it means we have to understand three things properly. Money, debt, and law. And it also means we have to relearn the most important thing we have forgotten: Who we are.

We are sovereign. We are the ones in control of our lives, not any government or monarch or banker. We the people are born sovereign and the only way we can lose our sovereignty is when we give it away. We create government to look after functions of the state, not to look after international corporate interests and steal everything, and not to keep us smothered under the weight of millions of silly statutes and rules which say we can’t do this and we must do that, thus keeping us effectively disarmed against their criminality. To understand these things properly we need to unlearn what we think we know about money, debt and law and look at these concepts with fresh eyes, because as much as we have been deceived about the activities of the financiers, the true reasons for our wars and the insidious nature of our media, all that pales in comparison to the level of deception foisted on us about money, debt and law. In recent months and years massive numbers of ordinary people the world over have discovered the true nature of money, debt and the law and the information has spread like wildfire. It is shocking, but knowing it is essential to getting out of the fix we’re in. To ever be truly free we must know the nature of the cage we are in.

Our governments are operating under commercial law, otherwise known as maritime admiralty law or the law of the high seas. This is a creation of the bankers, a way to control the current, the money, as it flows between the banks. All our governments, Ireland, the UK, the United States, the countries of Europe, and all their political parties, their courts, police forces, all are corporations, trading for profit. Our government is not only corrupt, criminal and treasonous, it is illegitimate.

For an introduction to these concepts please read the Freeman Guide, published by Tir Na Saor.

For an explanation of the situation regarding commercial law and the corporatisation of our governments our advice is to take some time and watch the following presentations:

John Harris ‘It’s an illusion.’

Hijacking Humanity

Bursting bubbles of government deception.

For a straight forward explanation of what money is and how it has come to rule us rather than serve us watch ‘Money as debt’

For a detailed explanation of how these international bankers have gotten us to this point watch: The money masters:

A recommended read is Eustice Mullins’ book ‘Secrets of the Federal Reserve’ which explains how the manipulation of the money supply has been acheived and how it allows these people to control thew world, literally.

For further information on the true nature of the law and how to become free and contribute to the solution to this incredible mess check www.tirnasaor.com, and www.tpuc.org

To see exactly how to settle your loans and mortgage and rid yourself of debt peacefully and lawfully read the following book; ‘Blank of Ireland, This way out’

http://tirnasaor.com/forum/attachment/download?id=3214356%3AUploadedFi35%3A124780

This book features Bank Of Ireland, but the situation is the same for ALL banks. All banks are operating in fraud, all loan contracts are null and void, and ALL of this debt can be settled peacefully and lawfully. The debt is the problem (actually it does go a lot deeper, but the debt is an enormous part of it and if it is solved then we are in a position to correct the other aspects) . No debt = no banking crisis. So the banks fail, go out of business. So what? Bye bye criminal banks who have enslaved our species, don’t slam the door on your way out. The response from the snakes in our media that the collapse or disappearence of one or all of these banks will herald the end of the world is ludicrous. The banks don’t pay the sun to shine yet.

If you take the time to look at this information you will have a most remarkable realisation. You will realise the depth of the deception that our whole species has been subjected to for centuries. You will realise that almost all our worst troubles need not have happened, and that we have now, right now, a most amazing opportunity, unprecedented. We can get out of these shackles now. For good. For once and for all we can be who we are supposed to be, free people. The world over. If we do that we will find that we are much, much, more than we have been led to believe by our public fool system and our whore media. We have an incredible journey ahead of us, a fantastic adventure. As much as we have been lied to about all of the topics covered in this article we have yet more to discover about ourselves, our true origin, our true abilities and our true destiny. David Rockefeller and his pals don’t want this to happen. They want install a regime of control and exploitation that will be unthinkably awful but which will benefit them greatly. They want to steal our planet and our future, and the future of our kids and the generations to come, and that’s why he’s a scumbag, and they are all scumbags. But the way to beat them is not to fight them, it’s to outsmart them.

Ireland has a very envious reputation as the country which saved civilisation during the dark ages, the ‘Island of Saints and Scholars’. Knowledge was preserved here while Europe spiralled into cultural and intellectual darkness, and it was spread back when the time was right. Knowledge needs to spread again now, around the world, the true knowledge of what’s been done to us, how it’s been done and how to rectify the situation. What better gift can we give ourselves and the world than to help that knowledge spread?

So, do we go out on the streets in futile riot led by Socialists until we get a new version of the same abuse? Or do we break the cycle, stop the abuse, and realise who we are, finally?

This is the biggest moment in ‘history’ folks.

Choose wisely.

Namaste.

Related posts:

1. Carbon Taxes – A Real Answer to a Fake Problem? With all the evidence that’s come to light in the last year, completely disproving Anthropogenic Global Warming, one would think that our Government would take it all on board and act accordingly. Unfortunately we live in a time when not...
2. VIDEO:Alex Jones interviews Alan K from We Are Change on the Trilateral Commission During our stake-out of the Four Seasons hotel we managed to record a conversation we had with a Trilateral Commission attendee, who admitted that they were “deciding the future of the world”, and that a one world bank was possible,...

global warming, globalism, gover, ireland, new world order, police state, state New World Order, The Law, The State